USA v. Clinton Scarlett


Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Clinton Deon Scarlett. Decision: Vacated and Remanded. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam.

Download PDF
Case: 12-13949 Date Filed: 04/18/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-13949 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:07-cr-20793-UU-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CLINTON DEON SCARLETT, Defendant - Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (April 18, 2013) Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, BARKETT and KLEINFELD, * Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Honorable Andrew J. Kleinfeld, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. Case: 12-13949 Date Filed: 04/18/2013 Page: 2 of 2 Clinton Deon Scarlett appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a sentence reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines, following his conviction for maintaining a drug-involved premise in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 856(a)(1). Because of the lack of clarity in the record, we vacate Scarlett’s original sentence and remand to the district court to resentence in accordance with Amendment 750. VACATED and REMANDED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?