USA v. Clinton Scarlett

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Clinton Deon Scarlett. Decision: Vacated and Remanded. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam.

Case: 12-13949

Date Filed: 04/18/2013

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-13949
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:07-cr-20793-UU-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CLINTON DEON SCARLETT,
Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(April 18, 2013)
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, BARKETT and KLEINFELD, * Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

*

Honorable Andrew J. Kleinfeld, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting
by designation.

Case: 12-13949

Date Filed: 04/18/2013

Page: 2 of 2

Clinton Deon Scarlett appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a
sentence reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 750 to the
Sentencing Guidelines, following his conviction for maintaining a drug-involved
premise in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 856(a)(1). Because of the lack of clarity in the
record, we vacate Scarlett’s original sentence and remand to the district court to
resentence in accordance with Amendment 750.
VACATED and REMANDED.

2