USA v. Eric Parker


Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Eric Jerome Parker. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by J. Carlton Taylor is GRANTED. [6748043-2]; Motion to dismiss appeal due to appeal waiver filed by Appellee USA is DENIED as MOOT. (Opinion Corrected on July 1, 2013) [6746243-2].--[Edited 07/01/2013 by JRP]

Download PDF
Case: 12-14662 Date Filed: 06/28/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-14662 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:11-cr-00191-MHT-SRW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERIC JEROME PARKER, a.k.a. E.P., Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama _________________________ (June 28, 2013) Before MARCUS, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-14662 Date Filed: 06/28/2013 Page: 2 of 2 J. Carlton Taylor, counsel for Eric Jerome Parker in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Parker’s convictions and sentences, are AFFIRMED. All remaining motions are DENIED AS MOOT. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?