Cambridge University Press, et al v. J.L. Albert, et al

Filing 111

Corrected Amicus Brief filed by Amicus Curiae Academic Authors and Legal Scholars. Service date: 05/03/2013 email - Attorney for Amicus Curium: Ablin, Aistars, Chapman, Dove, Joseph, Lerner, Meloy, Pequignot, Rasenberger, Schultz, Steinman, Stoltz, Tonsager, Wasoff; Attorney for Appellants: Bloom, Krugman, Larson, Rains, Rich, Singer; Attorney for Appellees: Ashby, Askew, Bates, Eskow, Gentry, Harbin, Levie, Lynn, Miller, Moffitt, Quicker, Schaetzel, Volkert, Warenzak, Whiting-Pack. (ECF: Jason Schultz)

Download PDF
May 3, 2013 Attention: Janet K. Spradlin and Jan S. Camp John Ley Clerk of Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Elbert Parr Tuttle Court of Appeals Building 56 Forsyth Street, N.W. Atlanta, Georgia30303 Re: JASON M. SCHULTZ Assistant Clinical Professor of Law Director, Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic UC Berkeley School of Law 587 Simon Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-7200 Tel (510) 642-1957 Fax (510) 643-4625 jschultz@law.berkeley.edu www.law.berkeley.edu/samuelsonclinic/ Appeal Number: 12-14676-FF ; 12-15147-FF Case Style: Cambridge University Press, et al. v. J.L. Albert, et al. District Court Docket Number: 1:08-cv-01425-ODE Dear Mr. Ley: In response to the Clerk’s letter dated May 2, 2013 (notice of brief deficiency), amici curiae Academic Authors and Legal Scholars hereby state that all parties have consented to the filing of amici’s brief pursuant to Fed. R. App. Proc. 29(a) and amici rely on this consent as the source of amici’s authority to file their brief under Fed. R. App. Proc. 29(c)(4). In compliance with instructions from the Clerk’s office, this letter is being served on all parties via ECF filing. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Signed, /s/ Jason Schultz Attorney for Amici Curiae Academic Authors and Legal Scholars

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?