Cambridge University Press, et al v. J.L. Albert, et al
Filing
111
Corrected Amicus Brief filed by Amicus Curiae Academic Authors and Legal Scholars. Service date: 05/03/2013 email - Attorney for Amicus Curium: Ablin, Aistars, Chapman, Dove, Joseph, Lerner, Meloy, Pequignot, Rasenberger, Schultz, Steinman, Stoltz, Tonsager, Wasoff; Attorney for Appellants: Bloom, Krugman, Larson, Rains, Rich, Singer; Attorney for Appellees: Ashby, Askew, Bates, Eskow, Gentry, Harbin, Levie, Lynn, Miller, Moffitt, Quicker, Schaetzel, Volkert, Warenzak, Whiting-Pack. (ECF: Jason Schultz)
May 3, 2013
Attention: Janet K. Spradlin and Jan S. Camp
John Ley
Clerk of Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Elbert Parr Tuttle Court of Appeals Building
56 Forsyth Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia30303
Re:
JASON M. SCHULTZ
Assistant Clinical Professor of Law
Director, Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic
UC Berkeley School of Law
587 Simon Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
Tel (510) 642-1957
Fax (510) 643-4625
jschultz@law.berkeley.edu
www.law.berkeley.edu/samuelsonclinic/
Appeal Number: 12-14676-FF ; 12-15147-FF
Case Style: Cambridge University Press, et al. v. J.L. Albert, et al.
District Court Docket Number: 1:08-cv-01425-ODE
Dear Mr. Ley:
In response to the Clerk’s letter dated May 2, 2013 (notice of brief deficiency), amici curiae Academic
Authors and Legal Scholars hereby state that all parties have consented to the filing of amici’s brief
pursuant to Fed. R. App. Proc. 29(a) and amici rely on this consent as the source of amici’s authority to
file their brief under Fed. R. App. Proc. 29(c)(4).
In compliance with instructions from the Clerk’s office, this letter is being served on all parties via ECF
filing. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.
Signed,
/s/ Jason Schultz
Attorney for Amici Curiae
Academic Authors and Legal Scholars
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?