Cambridge University Press, et al v. J. Albert, et al

Filing 41

RETURNED UNFILED: Motion for extension to file reply brief [6840638-2], Motion for extension to file reply brief [6833867-2] received from Jonathan Bloom for Appellants Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc. and Sage Publications, Inc., Edward B. Krugman for Appellants Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc. and Sage Publications, Inc., Todd D. Larson for Appellants Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc. and Sage Publications, Inc., John H. Rains, IV for Appellants Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc. and Sage Publications, Inc., Robert Bruce Rich for Appellants Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc. and Sage Publications, Inc. and Randi Wolkenbreit Singer for Appellants Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc. and Sage Publications, Inc. in 12-14676 is returned unfiled. [12-14676, 12-15147]

Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING 56 Forsyth Street, N.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 John Ley Clerk of Court For rules and forms visit www.ca11.uscourts.gov April 11, 2013 Edward B. Krugman Bondurant Mixson & Elmore, LLP 1201 W PEACHTREE ST NW STE 3900 ATLANTA, GA 30309 John H. Rains IV Bondurant Mixson & Elmore, LLP 1201 W PEACHTREE ST NW STE 3900 ATLANTA, GA 30309 Appeal Number: 12-14676-FF ; 12-15147 -FF Case Style: Cambridge University Press, et al v. J.L. Albert, et al District Court Docket No: 1:08-cv-01425-ODE RETURNED UNFILED: Appellants’ Joint motion for extension of time to file Appellants’ reply brief in 12-14676-FF and 12-15147-FF is returned unfiled. Please note no briefing date has been set for the reply brief, therefore, you motion is moot. Sincerely, JOHN LEY, Clerk of Court Reply to: Janet K. Spradlin, FF/caw Phone #: (404) 335-6178 MOT-11 Motion or Document Returned

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?