Cambridge University Press, et al v. J. Albert, et al
Filing
58
Notice of deficient Amicus brief filed by Attorney Jason Michael Schultz for Amicus Curiae Academic Authors and Legal Scholars in 12-14676, 12-15147.Deficiencies: Missing the source of its authority to file. [12-14676, 12-15147]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING
56 Forsyth Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
John Ley
Clerk of Court
May 02, 2013
For rules and forms visit
www.ca11.uscourts.gov
Jason Michael Schultz
Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic
BOALT HALL
UC BERKELEY SCHOOL OF LAW
396 SIMON HALL
BERKELEY, CA 94720-7200
Appeal Number: 12-14676-FF ; 12-15147 -FF
Case Style: Cambridge University Press, et al v. J.L. Albert, et al
District Court Docket No: 1:08-cv-01425-ODE
RULES PROVIDE FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE WHEN A BRIEF OR
RECORD EXCERPTS IS NOT FILED OR CORRECTED WITHIN THE TIME
PERMITTED.
The brief filed by you in the referenced appeal is deficient because you have not included the
required item(s) noted below:
**Amicus brief does not show a statement of consent (that all parties consent) and also the statement
of “The brief was authored in whole or in part by counsel . . .” See Fed.R.App.P. 29(c)(4) and (5). If
this statement is in fact in the brief and was missed, call the docket clerk at this number Jan S. Camp
404-335-6171.
One copy of your brief will be filed, subject to receipt of seven (7) copies of the item(s) noted above
within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from this date. The required item(s) must be served on all parties to
this appeal.
If instead of sending the specific item(s) noted above you choose to send a replacement brief, DO
NOT AMEND THE ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE DATE of the brief.
Sincerely,
JOHN LEY, Clerk of Court
Reply to: Janet K. Spradlin, FF/jsc
Phone #: (404) 335-6178
BR-7 Brief deficiency Ltr Corr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?