Cambridge University Press, et al v. J. Albert, et al

Filing 58

Notice of deficient Amicus brief filed by Attorney Jason Michael Schultz for Amicus Curiae Academic Authors and Legal Scholars in 12-14676, 12-15147.Deficiencies: Missing the source of its authority to file. [12-14676, 12-15147]

Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING 56 Forsyth Street, N.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 John Ley Clerk of Court May 02, 2013 For rules and forms visit www.ca11.uscourts.gov Jason Michael Schultz Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic BOALT HALL UC BERKELEY SCHOOL OF LAW 396 SIMON HALL BERKELEY, CA 94720-7200 Appeal Number: 12-14676-FF ; 12-15147 -FF Case Style: Cambridge University Press, et al v. J.L. Albert, et al District Court Docket No: 1:08-cv-01425-ODE RULES PROVIDE FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE WHEN A BRIEF OR RECORD EXCERPTS IS NOT FILED OR CORRECTED WITHIN THE TIME PERMITTED. The brief filed by you in the referenced appeal is deficient because you have not included the required item(s) noted below: **Amicus brief does not show a statement of consent (that all parties consent) and also the statement of “The brief was authored in whole or in part by counsel . . .” See Fed.R.App.P. 29(c)(4) and (5). If this statement is in fact in the brief and was missed, call the docket clerk at this number Jan S. Camp 404-335-6171. One copy of your brief will be filed, subject to receipt of seven (7) copies of the item(s) noted above within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from this date. The required item(s) must be served on all parties to this appeal. If instead of sending the specific item(s) noted above you choose to send a replacement brief, DO NOT AMEND THE ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE DATE of the brief. Sincerely, JOHN LEY, Clerk of Court Reply to: Janet K. Spradlin, FF/jsc Phone #: (404) 335-6178 BR-7 Brief deficiency Ltr Corr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?