USA v. Edgar Broussard


Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Edgar V. Broussard. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Appellant Edgar V. Broussard is GRANTED. [6807632-2]. (See 07/19/13 opinion)(CRW/JCH/RLA)

Download PDF
Case: 12-15980 Date Filed: 07/19/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-15980 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00304-KD-N-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDGAR V. BROUSSARD, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _________________________ (July 19, 2013) Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Neil H. Hanley, appointed counsel for Edgar V. Broussard in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that Case: 12-15980 Date Filed: 07/19/2013 Page: 2 of 2 counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Broussard’s revocation and sentence are AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?