USA v. Edgar Broussard

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Edgar V. Broussard. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Appellant Edgar V. Broussard is GRANTED. [6807632-2]. (See 07/19/13 opinion)(CRW/JCH/RLA)

Case: 12-15980

Date Filed: 07/19/2013

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-15980
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00304-KD-N-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDGAR V. BROUSSARD,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(July 19, 2013)
Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Neil H. Hanley, appointed counsel for Edgar V. Broussard in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,
18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

Case: 12-15980

Date Filed: 07/19/2013

Page: 2 of 2

counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Broussard’s revocation and
sentence are AFFIRMED.

2