USA v. Timothy Starks

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Timothy Starks. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Appellant Timothy Starks is GRANTED. [7527897-2]. (See 12/09/2015 opinion)(EEC/BBM/RLA) The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Case: 14-11519

Date Filed: 12/09/2015

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11519
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:07-cr-20588-DMM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TIMOTHY STARKS,
a.k.a. Tim Brown,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(December 9, 2015)
Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 14-11519

Date Filed: 12/09/2015

Page: 2 of 2

Mauricio Aldazabal, appointed counsel for Timothy Starks, in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Starks=s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.

2