Bank of America, N.A. v. Angelle Glaspie
Filing
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Bank of America, N.A.. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam.
Case: 14-13373
Date Filed: 10/29/2014
Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-13373
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket Nos. 1:14-cv-00743-JEC; 13-bkc-69958-CRM
In Re: ANGELLE CLAUDETTE GLASPIE,
Debtor.
________________________________________________________________
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
ANGELLE CLAUDETTE GLASPIE,
Defendant-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(October 29, 2014)
Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
Case: 14-13373
Date Filed: 10/29/2014
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Bank of America, N.A. appeals the district court’s summary affirmance of
the bankruptcy court’s order voiding a wholly unsecured second priority lien on
residential property owned by a Chapter 7 debtor.
The bankruptcy court granted Debtor’s request to “strip off” the unsecured
junior lien, based on this Court’s binding precedent in McNeal v. GMAC Mortg.,
LLC (In re McNeal), 735 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir. 2012) (citing Folendore v. United
States Small Bus. Admin., 862 F.2d 1537 (11th Cir. 1989)). In McNeal, we
concluded that a Chapter 7 debtor is allowed to “strip off” a second priority lien on
her home, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(a) and (d), when the first priority lien
exceeds the value of the property.
Bank of America acknowledges that its arguments on appeal are foreclosed
by the Court’s decisions in McNeal and Folendore but reserves the right to seek
reconsideration of the issue by the en banc Court. Cf. United States v. Smith, 122
F.3d 1355, 1359 (11th Cir. 1997) (“Under the prior panel precedent rule, we are
bound by earlier panel holdings . . . unless and until they are overruled en banc or
by the Supreme Court.”).
AFFIRMED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?