USA v. Viacheslav Zhukov


Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Viacheslav Zhukov. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Viacheslav Zhukov is DENIED as MOOT. [7509348-2]; Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Appellant Viacheslav Zhukov is GRANTED. [7514372-2]. (See 11/12/2015 opinion)(SM/WHP/RLA) The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link

Download PDF
Case: 14-15527 Date Filed: 11/12/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 14-15527 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:14-cr-00196-WTM-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VIACHESLAV ZHUKOV, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia ________________________ (November 12, 2015) Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-15527 Date Filed: 11/12/2015 Page: 2 of 2 John D. Carson, appointed counsel for Viacheslav Zhukov, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Zhukov’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED, and Zhukov’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED AS MOOT. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?