Richard Villarreal v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al


En Banc Opinion issued by court. Decision: Affirmed and Remanded. Opinion type: Published. Opinion method: Signed. (Opinion corrected on 10/05/2016. Typographical errors.)--[Edited 10/05/2016 by JRP]

Download PDF
Case: 15-10602 Date Filed: 10/05/2016 Page: 1 of 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING 56 Forsyth Street, N.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 David J. Smith Clerk of Court For rules and forms visit October 05, 2016 MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES Appeal Number: 15-10602-AA Case Style: Richard Villarreal v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al District Court Docket No: 2:12-cv-00138-RWS This Court requires all counsel to file documents electronically using the Electronic Case Files ("ECF") system, unless exempted for good cause. Enclosed is a copy of the court's decision filed today in this appeal. Judgment has this day been entered pursuant to FRAP 36. The court's mandate will issue at a later date in accordance with FRAP 41(b). Counsel appointed under the Criminal Justice Act (CJA) must submit a voucher claiming compensation for time spent on the appeal no later than 60 days after either issuance of mandate or filing with the U.S. Supreme Court of a petition for writ of certiorari (whichever is later) via the eVoucher system. Please contact the CJA Team at (404) 335-6167 or for questions regarding CJA vouchers or the eVoucher system. . The Bill of Costs form is available on the internet at For questions concerning the issuance of the decision of this court, please call the number referenced in the signature block below. For all other questions, please call David L. Thomas, AA at (404) 335-6169. Sincerely, DAVID J. SMITH, Clerk of Court Reply to: Jeff R. Patch Phone #: 404-335-6161 OPIN-1A Issuance of Opinion With Costs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?