USA v. Anaissa Gerwald

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Anaissa Beth Gerwald. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by George Asinc is GRANTED. [7457767-2]; Motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Anaissa Beth Gerwald is DENIED. [7479833-2]. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Download PDF
Case: 15-11172 Date Filed: 09/15/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-11172 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cr-00249-WTM-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANAISSA BETH GERWALD, a.k.a. Anaizza Gerwald, a.k.a. Ann E. Meraw, a.k.a. Ana Isabel Marraquin, a.k.a. Ana Isabel Garcia, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia ________________________ (September 15, 2015) Case: 15-11172 Date Filed: 09/15/2015 Page: 2 of 2 Before TJOFLAT, ROSENBAUM, and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: George R. Asinc, appointed counsel for Anaissa Gerwald in this criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Gerwald’s supervised release and her revocation sentence are AFFIRMED. Gerwald’s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?