USA v. Adrian Ingram


Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Adrian Labar Ingram. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Martin Charles Puetz is GRANTED. [8142064-2]. (See 10/13/2017 opinion)(GBT/WHP/BBM) The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link

Download PDF
Case: 15-11868 Date Filed: 10/13/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-11868 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00043-JRH-BKE-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ADRIAN LABAR INGRAM, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia ________________________ (October 13, 2017) Before TJOFLAT, WILLIAM PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-11868 Date Filed: 10/13/2017 Page: 2 of 2 Martin C. Puetz, retained counsel for Adrian Labar Ingram in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ingram’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?