USA v. Ramiro Antunez-Pineda

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Ramiro Antunez-Pineda. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Colette Resnik Steel is GRANTED. [7563519-2].(See 01/11/2016 order)(FMH/CRW/RSR) The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Download PDF
Case: 15-12110 Date Filed: 01/11/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-12110 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00272-WSD-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAMIRO ANTUNEZ-PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________ (January 11, 2016) Before HULL, WILSON and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-12110 Date Filed: 01/11/2016 Page: 2 of 2 Colette Resnik Steel, appointed counsel for Ramiro Antunez-Pineda, in this direct criminal appeal, as moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Antunez-Pineda’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?