USA v. Clinton Dunston

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Clinton James Dunston. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Conrad Benjamin Kahn is GRANTED. [7742553-2].(See 09/29/2016 opinion)(WHP/BBM/RLA) The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Case: 15-13709

Date Filed: 09/29/2016

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-13709
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 6:13-cr-00171-RBD-GJK-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CLINTON JAMES DUNSTON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 29, 2016)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender’s Office, through attorney Conrad Kahn, has
moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant in this appeal of
the district court’s denial of a motion to reduce sentence brought under 18 U.S.C. §

Case: 15-13709

Date Filed: 09/29/2016

Page: 2 of 2

3582(c)(2), and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87
S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial
of the motion to reduce sentence is AFFIRMED.

2