Corcel Corporation, Inc. v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc., et al

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Corcel Corporation, Inc.. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Case: 15-15315

Date Filed: 01/30/2017

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-15315
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:12-cv-80896-DPG

CORCEL CORPORATION, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC.,
A Virginia Corporation,
LINE-TEC, INC.,
A Florida Corporation,
AKA SERVICES, INC.,
A Florida Corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(January 30, 2017)

Case: 15-15315

Date Filed: 01/30/2017

Page: 2 of 2

Before TJOFLAT, HULL and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After review and careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record,
we affirm the district court’s order granting Defendants-Appellees’ motions for
summary judgment, which concluded that the statute of limitations barred PlaintiffAppellant’s civil Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act claims, 18
U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968. The parties are already familiar with the facts and
procedural history, and we affirm for the reasons outlined in the district court’s
thorough and well-reasoned order dated March 8, 2016.
AFFIRMED.

2