USA v. Dewayne Jones

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Dewayne Earl Jones in 15-15563, 15-15630. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Lisa Call is GRANTED. [7743378-2] in 15-15563, Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Lisa Call is GRANTED. [7743392-2] in 15-15630. (See 11/10/16 opinion)(GBT/CRW/WHP) The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions. [15-15563, 15-15630]

Download PDF
Case: 15-15563 Date Filed: 11/10/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-15563 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:09-cr-00100-TJC-JRK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEWAYNE EARL JONES, a.k.a. Pokey, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ No. 15-15630 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:09-cr-00119-TJC-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, Case: 15-15563 Date Filed: 11/10/2016 Page: 2 of 2 versus DEWAYNE EARL JONES, a.k.a. Pokey, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (November 10, 2016) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Lisa Call, appointed counsel for Dewayne Earl Jones, in this appeal of his supervised release revocation and total sentence, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jones’s revocation and sentence are AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?