Gina Phillips v. James Browne

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant James Browne. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Case: 16-11573

Date Filed: 10/19/2016

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-11573
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cv-00966-RDP

GINA MAREA PHILLIPS,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES BROWNE,

Defendant-Appellant,
JOHN MARK TIREY, et al.,
Defendants.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
________________________
(October 19, 2016)

Case: 16-11573

Date Filed: 10/19/2016

Page: 2 of 2

Before TJOFLAT, HULL, and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jim Browne, a law enforcement officer, appeals the District Court’s March
9, 2016, order denying his motion for summary judgment---based on the defense of
qualified immunity---on Gina Marea Phillips’s claims of excessive force and
unlawful seizure brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 33. After reading the
parties’ briefs and the record before the District Court, we find no basis for
disturbing the Court’s order.
AFFIRMED.

2