Gina Phillips v. James Browne


Opinion issued by court as to Appellant James Browne. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link

Download PDF
Case: 16-11573 Date Filed: 10/19/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-11573 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cv-00966-RDP GINA MAREA PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES BROWNE, Defendant-Appellant, JOHN MARK TIREY, et al., Defendants. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ________________________ (October 19, 2016) Case: 16-11573 Date Filed: 10/19/2016 Page: 2 of 2 Before TJOFLAT, HULL, and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Jim Browne, a law enforcement officer, appeals the District Court’s March 9, 2016, order denying his motion for summary judgment---based on the defense of qualified immunity---on Gina Marea Phillips’s claims of excessive force and unlawful seizure brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 33. After reading the parties’ briefs and the record before the District Court, we find no basis for disturbing the Court’s order. AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?