USA v. Alan Thompson, Jr.
Filing
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Alan Kenneth Thompson, Jr.. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Adeel Bashir is GRANTED. [7887845-2]; Motion to strike filed by Appellant Alan Kenneth Thompson, Jr. is DENIED. [7905128-2]; Motion to stay briefing filed by Appellant Alan Kenneth Thompson, Jr. is DENIED. [7905128-3]; Motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Alan Kenneth Thompson, Jr. is DENIED. [7905128-4]; Motion for extension to file response to motion filed by Appellant Alan Kenneth Thompson, Jr. is DENIED. [7905128-5]. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.
Case: 16-13605
Date Filed: 12/28/2016
Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-13605
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:15-cr-00052-WTH-PRL-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALAN KENNETH THOMPSON, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(December 28, 2016)
Before HULL, WILSON and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Adeel Bashir, appointed counsel for Alan Kenneth Thompson, Jr., in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 16-13605
Date Filed: 12/28/2016
Page: 2 of 2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, Thompson’s pro se motions are DENIED, and Thompson’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?