Robert Wright, Jr. v. John Goodrich, et al


Opinion issued by court as to Appellants John Goodrich and Jerald Watson. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link

Download PDF
Case: 16-16281 Date Filed: 04/12/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-16281 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:15-cv-00034-CDL ROBERT H. WRIGHT, JR., Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOHN GOODRICH, Deputy, JERALD WATSON, Defendant-Appellants. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia ________________________ (April 12, 2017) Case: 16-16281 Date Filed: 04/12/2017 Page: 2 of 2 Before WILSON and BLACK Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, * Judge. PER CURIAM: After careful review of the briefs and the record, and having the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error. We have considered all of John Goodrich and Jerald Watson’s specifications of error, reviewing de novo the following: 1. Whether the district court erred in denying Watson and Goodrich qualified immunity on Robert Wright’s Fourth Amendment claim? 2. Whether the district court erred in in denying Watson and Goodrich official immunity on Robert Wright’s parallel state law claim? The decision of the district court is AFFIRMED. * Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?