Robert Wright, Jr. v. John Goodrich, et al

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellants John Goodrich and Jerald Watson. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Case: 16-16281

Date Filed: 04/12/2017

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-16281
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:15-cv-00034-CDL

ROBERT H. WRIGHT, JR.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOHN GOODRICH, Deputy,
JERALD WATSON,
Defendant-Appellants.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(April 12, 2017)

Case: 16-16281

Date Filed: 04/12/2017

Page: 2 of 2

Before WILSON and BLACK Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, * Judge.
PER CURIAM:
After careful review of the briefs and the record, and having the benefit of
oral argument, we find no reversible error. We have considered all of John
Goodrich and Jerald Watson’s specifications of error, reviewing de novo the
following:
1. Whether the district court erred in denying Watson and Goodrich
qualified immunity on Robert Wright’s Fourth Amendment claim?
2. Whether the district court erred in in denying Watson and Goodrich
official immunity on Robert Wright’s parallel state law claim?
The decision of the district court is
AFFIRMED.

*

Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by
designation.
2