USA v. Octavius Henderson

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Octavius R. Henderson. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by William Sansone is GRANTED. [8202267-2]. (See 12/06/2017 opinion)(BBM/JP/SHB) The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Case: 17-10706

Date Filed: 12/06/2017

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 17-10706
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00366-SDM-AEP-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
OCTAVIUS HENDERSON,
a.k.a. Octavious Henderson,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(December 6, 2017)
Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
William Sansone, appointed counsel for Octavius Henderson in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

Case: 17-10706

Date Filed: 12/06/2017

Page: 2 of 2

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Henderson’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2