Stacy Burke v. Postmaster General, et al

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Stacy Burke. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Case: 17-11046

Date Filed: 04/12/2018

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 17-11046
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:16-cv-00090-RH-GRJ

STACY BURKE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
POSTMASTER GENERAL,
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Defendants - Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(April 12, 2018)
Before WILSON, JORDAN, and HIGGINBOTHAM,* 1Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
*Honorable Patrick E. Higginbotham, United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by
designation.

Case: 17-11046

Date Filed: 04/12/2018

Page: 2 of 2

We have considered all of Stacey Burke’s specifications of error. We have
reviewed de novo the following:
1. Did the district court err in granting the Postal Service’s motion for
judgment as a matter of law on the race discrimination claim?
2. Did the district court err in granting the Postal Service’s motion for
judgment as a matter of law on the retaliation claim?
After careful review of the briefs and the record, and having the benefit of
oral argument, we find no reversible error. The decision of the district court is
AFFIRMED.

2