USA v. Lonzine Adams

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Lonzine Adams. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Lonzine Adams is DENIED. [8400752-2]; Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Thomas A. Burns is GRANTED. [8316703-2]. (See 04/10/2018 opinion)(GBT/KCN/FMH) The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Download PDF
Case: 17-11686 Date Filed: 04/10/2018 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-11686 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:14−cr−00102−MSS−AAS−1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LONZINE ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (April 10, 2018) Before TJOFLAT, NEWSOM and HULL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Thomas Burns, appointed counsel for Lonzine Adams in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and Case: 17-11686 Date Filed: 04/10/2018 Page: 2 of 2 filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Adams’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Accordingly, we DENY Adams’s motion for the appointment of new counsel as moot. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?