USA v. Rene Borrero
Filing
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Rene Borrero. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Rosanne Loretta Brady is GRANTED. [8357287-2]; Motion to discharge counsel filed by Appellant Rene Borrero is DENIED. [8358338-2]. (See 04/13/2018 opinion) (CRW/BBM/JP) The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.--[Edited 04/13/2018 by DC]
Case: 17-14010
Date Filed: 04/13/2018
Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 17-14010
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr-00311-EAK-MAP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RENE BORRERO,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(April 13, 2018)
Before WILSON, MARTIN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 17-14010
Date Filed: 04/13/2018
Page: 2 of 2
Roseanne Brady, appointed counsel for Rene Borrero in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Borrero’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Further,
Borrero’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?