Viacom International, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc.

Filing 321

LETTER, dated 04/08/2011, on behalf of Appellee Google, Inc., Youtube, Inc. and Youtube, LLC, RECEIVED. Service date 04/08/2011 by CM/ECF.[257716] [10-3270]

Download PDF
Viacom International, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc. Doc. 321 Mayer Brown LLP 1675 Broadway New York, New York 10019-5820 Main Tel +1 212 506 2500 Main Fax +1 212 262 1910 April 8, 2011 VIA CM/ECF Ms. Deborah Holmes Ms. Kimberly Gay Case Managers, Clerk's Office United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: Viacom Int'l Inc., et al., v. YouTube Inc., et al., No. 10-3270; The Football Association Premier League, et al., v. YouTube Inc., et al., No. 10-3342 Andrew H. Schapiro Direct Tel +1 212 506 2672 Direct Fax +1 212 849 5672 Dear Ms. Holmes and Ms. Gay: We represent Defendants-Appellees in the above captioned matters. Pursuant to the Notice issued on April 1, 2011, Defendants -Appellees hereby re-file electronically the public redacted version of the Brief for Defendants-Appellees (originally filed March 31, 2011). It has come to our attention that the brief inadvertently contained the following non-substantive exhibit citation errors, which have been corrected in this submission and in resubmitted hard copies: Pages 19, 46 n.15, 56 n.21 41 n.12 22 54 n. 19 (cont.) 93 Sincerely, /s Andrew H. Schapiro Andrew H. Schapiro Prior Citation JA-V:810 SJA-V:810 SPA:7 Schapiro Opp. Ex. 212 Corrected Citation JA-VI:810 JA-VI:810 SPA:10 SJA-VIII: 1970-1971, 2015 (excerpted from Schapiro Opp. Ex. 212) Corrected zip codes in signature block Cc: All counsel of record (via CM/ECF) Mayer Brown LLP operates in combination with our associated English limited liability partnership and Hong Kong partnership (and its associated entities in Asia) and is associated with Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?