Viacom International, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc.
ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT LR 34.1 (a), on behalf of filer Attorney Mr. Andrew H. Schapiro for Appellee Google, Inc., Youtube, Inc. and Youtube, LLC, FILED. Service date 04/14/2011 by CM/ECF.  [10-3270]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT (Local Rule 34.1(a))
TO REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT, FILL OUT THIS FORM AND FILE IT WITH THE CLERK
WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF THE LAST APPELLEE BRIEF.
IF THIS FORM IS NOT TIMELY FILED, YOU WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO ARGUE IN PERSON.
Short Title of Case: Viacom Int'l, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc.; The Football Assoc. v. YouTube, Inc. Docket No.: 10-3270, 10-3342
Name of Party:
Google Inc., YouTube, Inc., and YouTube, LLC
Status of Party (e.g., appellant, cross-appellee, etc.):
Check one of the three options below:
I want oral argument.
I want oral argument only if
at least one other party does.
An attorney whose preference depends on whether other
attorneys will argue should consider conferring before
requesting argument. After the appeal has been
scheduled for oral argument, a motion by counsel to forgo
oral argument, even on consent, may be denied.
I do not want oral argument.
If no party wants oral argument, the case will be decided on the basis of the written briefs. If you want oral
argument, you must appear in Court on the date set by the Court for oral argument.
The Court may determ ine to decide a case without oral argument even if the parties request it.
If you want oral argument, state the name of the person who will argue:
Name: Andrew H. Schapiro
(An attorney must be admitted to practice before the Court in accordance with Local Rule 46.1.)
If you want oral argument, list any dates (including religious holidays), that fall in the interval from 6 to 12 weeks
after the due date of this form, that the person who will argue is not available to appear in Court:
Mr. Schapiro will be unavailable to appear in Court on May 26-June 3, June 8-9, 17, 20, 27,
and July 5, 2011.
ANYONE WHO WANTS TO ARGUE MUST UPDATE THE COURT IN WRITING OF ANY CHANGE IN
AVAILABILITY. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY BE CONSIDERED BY THE COURT IN DECIDING MOTIONS FOR
POSTPONEMENT OF THE ARGUMENT DATE SET BY THE COURT.
Andrew H. Schapiro
/s/ Andrew H. Schapiro
(Revised September 2009)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?