The Football Association Premi v. Youtube, Inc.

Filing 130

SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellee Google, Inc., Youtube, Inc. and Youtube, LLC Brief due date as 03/31/2011, FILED.[167600] [10-3342]

Download PDF
The Football Association Premi v. Youtube, Inc. Doc. 130 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________________________________ At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on the 15th day of December, two thousand and ten, ____________________________________ The Football Association Premier League Limited, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Bourne Co., Cal IV Entertainment, LLC, Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc., National Music Publishers' Association, The Rodgers & Hammerstein Organization, Edward B. Marks Music Company, Freddy Bienstock Music Company, DBA Bienstock Publishing Company, Alley Music Corporation, X-Ray Dog Music, Inc., Federation Francaise De Tennis, The Music Force Media Group LLC, Sin-Drome Records, Ltd., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Murbo Music Publishing, Inc., Stage Three Music (US), Inc., The Music Force LLC, Plaintiffs - Appellants, Robert Tur, DBA Los Angeles News Service, The Scottish Premier League Limited, Plaintiffs, v. Youtube, Inc., Youtube, LLC, Google, Inc., Defendants - Appellees. ORDER Docket Number: 10-3342 Dockets.Justia.com _______________________________________ APPELLEES Youtube, Inc., Youtube, LLC, and Google, Inc have filed a scheduling notification pursuant to the Court's Local Rule 31.2, setting March 31, 20111 as the brief filing date. The scheduling notification hereby is so ordered. For The Court: Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk Kimberly Gay, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?