The Football Association Premi v. Youtube, Inc.

Filing 396

ORDER, that all other parties must file comments on the projected dismissal that is the subject of the stipulation on or before 09/09/2011, FILED.[382378] [10-3342]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
_________________

At a Stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on
the 2nd day of September, two thousand and eleven.
_____________________________________________
THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION, ET AL.,
ORDER
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Docket No.: 10-3342
v.
YOUTUBE, INC., YOUTUBE, LLC, GOOGLE,
INC.
Defendants-Appellees.
_____________________________________________
On August 24, 2011, certain appellants and the appellees filed a stipulation of dismissal
with prejudice. On August 29, 2011, appellant the Football Association filed a letter that the
stipulation was improper, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42 and Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a). IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that all other parties must file comments on the projected dismissal that is the
subject of the stipulation on or before close of business on September 9, 2011.
FOR THE COURT:
CATHERINE O’HAGAN WOLFE: Clerk