The Football Association Premi v. Youtube, Inc.

Filing 472

LETTER, on behalf of Appellee Google, Inc., Youtube, Inc. and Youtube, LLC, RECEIVED. Service date 04/19/2012 by CM/ECF.[585835] [10-3342]

Download PDF
650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 PHONE 650.493.9300 FAX 650.493.6811 www.wsgr.com April 19, 2012 VIA ECF Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: The Football Ass’n Premier League, et al. v. YouTube, Inc., et al. No. 10-3342 cv Dear Ms. Wolfe: Pursuant to the telephonic discussion with the clerk’s office today, YouTube, Inc., YouTube LLC, and Google Inc. (“Appellees”) are informed that the Non-Dispositive Stipulation filed on April 18, 2012, Docket Item 470, is not necessary due to the April 5, 2012 Order providing for remand to the District Court, and that a stipulation of dismissal should instead be filed in District Court. The Appellees, Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc. and Stage Three Music (US), Inc. will therefore withdraw Docket Item 470 and file the stipulated dismissal in the District Court following remand. Respectfully submitted, WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation /s/ Maura L. Rees Maura L. Rees Attorneys for Appellees YouTube, Inc., YouTube LLC, and Google, Inc. cc: All counsel via ECF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?