Millea v. Metro-North Railroad Company

Filing

OPINION, judgment of the distrcit court is affirmed in part, vacated in part and the case is remanded, by DJ., PWH., SAS*, FILED.[358560] [10-409, 10-564]

Download PDF
Case: 10-409 Document: 137-3 Page: 1 08/08/2011 358560 2 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 DENNIS JACOBS CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT Date: August 08, 2011 Docket #: 10-409 cv Short Title: Millea v. Metro-North Railroad Company DC Docket #: 06-cv-1929 DC Court: CONNECTICUT (NEW HAVEN)DC Docket #: 06-cv-1929 DC Court: CONNECTICUT (NEW HAVEN) DC Judge: Bryant VERIFIED ITEMIZED BILL OF COSTS Counsel for _________________________________________________________________________ respectfully submits, pursuant to FRAP 39 (c) the within bill of costs and requests the Clerk to prepare an itemized statement of costs taxed against the ________________________________________________________________ and in favor of _________________________________________________________________________ for insertion in the mandate. Docketing Fee _____________________ Costs of printing appendix (necessary copies ______________ ) _____________________ Costs of printing brief (necessary copies ______________ ____) _____________________ Costs of printing reply brief (necessary copies ______________ ) _____________________ (VERIFICATION HERE) ________________________ Signature Case: 10-409 Document: 137-3 Page: 2 08/08/2011 358560 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?