TradeComet.Com LLC v. Google, Inc.

Filing 69

ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT LR 34.1 (a), on behalf of filer Attorney Charles Frederick Rule for Appellant TradeComet.Com LLC, FILED. Service date 09/07/2010 by CM/ECF. [101649] [10-911]

TradeComet.Com LLC v. Google, Inc.

Doc. 69

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT (Local Rule 34.1(a))

TO REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT, FILL OUT THIS FORM AND FILE IT WITH THE CLERK WITHIN 21 DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF THE LAST APPELLEE BRIEF. IF THIS FORM IS NOT TIMELY FILED, YOU WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO ARGUE IN PERSON. Short Title of Case: Name of Party:

TradeComet.com LLC v. Google Inc.

Docket No.:

10-911

TradeComet.com LLC Appellant

Status of Party (e.g., appellant, cross-appellee, etc.): Check one of the three options below:

x

I want oral argument. I want oral argument only if at least one other party does. I do not want oral argument.

A n attorney whose preference depends on whether other a t to r n e y s will argue should consider conferring before r e q u e s tin g argum e n t. After the appeal has been s c h e d u le d for oral argum e n t, a m o tio n by counsel to forgo o r a l argum e n t, even on consent, m a y be denied.

If no party wants oral argument, the case will be decided on the basis of the written briefs. If you want oral argument, you must appear in Court on the date set by the Court for oral argument. The Court may determine to decide a case without oral argument even if the parties request it.

If you want oral argument, state the name of the person who will argue: Name:

Charles F. Rule

(An attorney must be admitted to practice before the Court in accordance with Local Rule 46.1.) If you want oral argument, list any dates (including religious holidays), that fall in the interval from 6 to 12 weeks after the due date of this form, that the person who will argue is not available to appear in Court:

October 25 - October 29; November 1; November 24; and November 26.

ANYONE WHO WANTS TO ARGUE MUST UPDATE THE COURT IN WRITING OF ANY CHANGE IN AVAILABILITY. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY BE CONSIDERED BY THE COURT IN DECIDING MOTIONS FOR POSTPONEMENT OF THE ARGUMENT DATE SET BY THE COURT.

Filed by: Print Name: Signature:

Charles F. Rule

Date:

09/07/2010

/s/ Charles F. Rule

(Revised September 2009)

Dockets.Justia.com