Cariou v. Prince

Filing 224

NOTICE OF HEARING DATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT, on behalf of Appellee Patrick Cariou, FILED. Service date 04/16/2012 by CM/ECF. [581360] [11-1197]

Download PDF
Case: hl ite 1tii3ppJrlme e 9I?ruit 580689 Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 DENNIS JACOBS CATHERINE O’IJAGAN WOLFE CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT Date: April 16, 2012 Docket #: 11-1 197cv Short Title: Patrick Cariou v. Richard Prince DC Docket fi: 08-cv-1 1327 DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK CITY) DC Judge: Batts NOTICE OF HEARING DATE Argument Date/Time: Monday, May 21, 2012 at 10:00am Location: Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York NY, 9 " Floor Ceremonial Courtroom Time Allotment: 12 minutes per side. Counsel and non-incarcerated pro se litigants presenting oral argument must register with the courtroom deputy 30 minutes before argument. A motion or stipulation to withdraw with or without prejudice must be filed within 3 business days of argument. The Court will consider the motion or stipulation at the time of argument, and counsel’s appearance is required with counsel prepared to argue the merits of the case. If a stipulation to withdraw with prejudice is based on a final settlement of the case, the fully-executed settlement must be reported immediately to the Calendar Team, and a copy of it must be attached to the stipulation. Inquiries regarding this case may be directed to 212-857-8595. Counsel must file the completed form in accordance with Local Rule 25.1 or 25.2. Pro Se parties must submit the form in paper. Name of the Attorney/Pro Se presenting argument: Daniel J. Brooks, Esq. Firm Name (if applicable): Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP Current Telephone Number: 212-973-8000 The above named attorney represents: ()Appellant/Petitioner (x) Appellee-Respondnt () Intervenor Date: April 16, 2012 Signature:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?