Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLP

Filing

OPINION, we reverse the March 3, 2011 order of the district court and remand the cause to the district court for further proceedings, per curiam RKW, JAC, CJS, FILED.[1012393] [12-304]

Download PDF
Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLP Doc. 212667849 Att. 2 Case: 12-304 Document: 247-3 Page: 1 08/09/2013 1012393 2 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 DENNIS JACOBS CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT Date: August 09, 2013 Docket #: 12-304cv Short Title: Stephanie Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLP DC Docket #: 10-cv-3332 DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK CITY) DC Judge: Wood Dolinger VERIFIED ITEMIZED BILL OF COSTS Counsel for _________________________________________________________________________ respectfully submits, pursuant to FRAP 39 (c) the within bill of costs and requests the Clerk to prepare an itemized statement of costs taxed against the ________________________________________________________________ and in favor of _________________________________________________________________________ for insertion in the mandate. Docketing Fee _____________________ Costs of printing appendix (necessary copies ______________ ) _____________________ Costs of printing brief (necessary copies ______________ ____) _____________________ Costs of printing reply brief (necessary copies ______________ ) _____________________ (VERIFICATION HERE) ________________________ Signature Dockets.Justia.com Case: 12-304 Document: 247-3 Page: 2 08/09/2013 1012393 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?