Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLP

Filing

OPINION, we reverse the March 3, 2011 order of the district court and remand the cause to the district court for further proceedings, per curiam RKW, JAC, CJS, FILED.[1012393] [12-304]

Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLP

Doc. 212667849 Att. 2

Case: 12-304

Document: 247-3

Page: 1

08/09/2013

1012393

2

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
DENNIS JACOBS

CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE

CHIEF JUDGE

CLERK OF COURT

Date: August 09, 2013
Docket #: 12-304cv
Short Title: Stephanie Sutherland v. Ernst & Young
LLP

DC Docket #: 10-cv-3332
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK CITY)
DC Judge: Wood
Dolinger

VERIFIED ITEMIZED BILL OF COSTS
Counsel for
_________________________________________________________________________
respectfully submits, pursuant to FRAP 39 (c) the within bill of costs and requests the Clerk to
prepare an itemized statement of costs taxed against the
________________________________________________________________
and in favor of
_________________________________________________________________________
for insertion in the mandate.
Docketing Fee

_____________________

Costs of printing appendix (necessary copies ______________ ) _____________________
Costs of printing brief (necessary copies ______________ ____) _____________________
Costs of printing reply brief (necessary copies ______________ ) _____________________

(VERIFICATION HERE)
________________________
Signature

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 12-304

Document: 247-3

Page: 2

08/09/2013

1012393

2