The Authors Guild v. Google, Inc.

Filing 143

MOTION ORDER, referring motion to file amended sealed amicus curiae brief [138] filed by Amicus Curiae The American Society of Media Photographers, Inc., Graphic Artists Guild, Picture Archive Council of America, Inc., North American Nature Photography Association, Professional Photographers of America, Leif Skoogfors, Al Satterwhite, Morton Beebe, Ed Kashi, John Schmelzer, Simms Taback, Leland Bobbe, John Francis Ficara and David W. Moser; referring motion to file supplemental appendix [138] filed by Amicus Curiae The American Society of Media Photographers, Inc., Graphic Artists Guild, Picture Archive Council of America, Inc., North American Nature Photography Association, Professional Photographers of America, Leif Skoogfors, Al Satterwhite, Morton Beebe, Ed Kashi, John Schmelzer, Simms Taback, Leland Bobbe, John Francis Ficara and David W. Moser, FILED. [863728][143] [12-3200] [Entered: 03/04/2013 02:59 PM]

Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________________________________________ At a Stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 4th day of March, two thousand and thirteen. _____________________________________________ The Authors Guild, Inc., Associational Plaintiff, Betty Miles, Joseph Goulden, and Jim Bouton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER Docket No. 12-3200 Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. Google, Inc., Defendant - Appellant. _____________________________________________ IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion by The American Society of Media Photographers, Inc., et al., for permission to file an amended amicus brief under seal and to submit a supplemental appendix is REFERRED to the panel that will determine the merits of the appeal. For the Court: Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?