The Authors Guild v. Google, Inc.

Filing 70

REPLY TO OPPOSITION [67], on behalf of Movant Electronic Arts, Inc., Pinterest, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc., FILED. Service date 11/21/2012 by CM/ECF.[776229][70] [12-3200] [Entered: 11/21/2012 06:28 PM]

Download PDF
ANDREW P. BRIDGES FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415.875.2300 Facsimile: 415.281.1350 Attorneys for Prospective Amici Curiae ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., PINTEREST, INC., and YAHOO! INC. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT THE AUTHORS GUILD, INC., Associational Plaintiff, BETTY MILES, JOSEPH GOULDEN, and JIM BOUTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 12-3200 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION BY PROPOSED AMICI CURIAE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND ONLINE PLATFORMS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SEEK LEAVE AND FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF Movants Amici Curiae reply to the opposition that Appellees filed simply to point out the following. The Appellees have just requested a briefing deadline of February 8, 2013, pursuant to Second Circuit Local Rule 31.2(a)(1)(B), and they have ample time to take into account the proposed brief of Amici Curiae if the Amici gain permission to file their brief on November 30, 2012. In addition, while Appellees’ counsel states that counsel for the Appellants are well equipped to present the issues before the Court, the Amici Curiae wish to make broader points about important issues that extend beyond the particular parties in this case. The Amici Curiae believe they may contribute a useful perspective that does not reiterate Google’s points. November 21, 2012 By: /s/ Andrew P. Bridges Andrew P. Bridges FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415.875.2300 Facsimile: 415.281.1350 Attorneys for Prospective Amici Curiae ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., PINTEREST, INC., and YAHOO! INC. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?