The Authors Guild v. Google, Inc.
ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT LR 34.1 (a), on behalf of filer Attorney Edward Rosenthal, Esq. for Appellant Betty Miles, Joseph Goulden, Jim Bouton and The Authors Guild, FILED. Service date 07/15/2014 by CM/ECF.  [13-4829]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT (Local Rule 34.1(a))
TO REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT, FILL OUT THIS FORM AND FILE IT WITH THE CLERK
WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER THE PILING OF THE LAST APPELLEE BRIEF.
IF THIS FORM (S NOT TIMELY FILED, YOU WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO ARGUE IN PERSON.
Short Title of Case: The Authors Guild, et al. v. Google, Inc.
Docket No.: 13.4829
Name ol Party: The Authors Guild, Betty Miles, Jim Bouton. Joseph Goulden
Status of Party (e.g., appellant, cross-appellee. etc.): Appellants
Check one of the three options below:
wan ore argumen
I want oral argument only if
at least one other party does,
An attorney whose preference depends on whether other
attorneys will argue should consider conferring before
requesting argument. After the appeal has been
scheduled for oral argument, a motion by counsel to forgo
oral argument, even on consent. may be denied.
I do not want oral argument.
If no party wants oral argument, the case will be decided on the basis of the written briefs.
argument, you must appear in Court on the date set by the Court for oral argument.
If you want oral
The Court may determine to decide a case without oral argument even it the parties request it.
If you want oral argument, state the name of the person who will argue:
Name. PaLl M Smith
(An attorney must be admitteb to s’ractice before the Court in accordarce with Local Rule 461.)
Ifyou want oral argument, list any dates (including relgious holidays), that fall in the interval from 6 to 23 weeks
after the due date ci this form, that the person who will argue is not avalable to appear in Court:
August 25-29; September 2-5, 15-19. 22. 25, October10, 13-17, 24, 27-31; November 7, 10-Il, 14,28
ANYONE WHO WANTS TO ARGUE MUST UPDATE THE COURT IN WRITING OF ANY CHANGE IN
AVAILABILITY. THE COURT MAY CONSIDER A FAILURE TO UPDATE ABOUT AVAILABILITY WHEN
DECIDING A MOTION TO POSTPONE A SET ARGUMENT DATE.
Edward H. Rosenthal, Esq., Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, P.C. Date: 7/1 5/14
Is) Edward H. Rosenthal
(Revised December 2011)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?