The Authors Guild v. Google, Inc.
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS AMICUS COUNSEL, on behalf of Amicus Curiae American Photographic Artists, American Society of Media Photographers, Inc., Graphic Artists Guild, Mystery Writers of America, The National Association of Science Writers, National Press Photographers Association, National Writers Union, North American Nature Photography Association, Professional Photographers of America, Romance Writers of America, Society of Children's Book Writers and Illustrators, The Songwriters Guild of America, Text and Academic Authors Association, The Digital Media Licensing Association and Western Writers of America, FILED. Service date 04/14/2014 by CM/ECF.  [13-4829]--[Edited 04/16/2014 by KG]
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR SUBSTITUTE, ADDITIONAL, OR AMICUS COUNSEL
Docket No.: 13 -4829
Short Tide: Authors Guild v. Google, Inc.
Substitute, Additional, or Amicus Counsel's Contact Information is as follows:
DeBaets, Abrahams & Sheppard LLP
Madison Avenue, 34th Floor, New York, New York 1001 0
Appearance for: American Photographic Artists (APA), American Society ot Media Photographers, Inc. (ASMP), Graphic Artists Guild (GAG), et al.
Osubstitute counsel (replacing lead counsel:_ _ _ _- , - - . . . , . , - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '
Dsubstitute counsel (replacing other counsel: _ _ __ _ _ _ , - - , - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ ;
OMditional counsel (co-counsel w i t h • - - - - - - , - - - . . , . , - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '
~icus (in support of: The Authors Guild I Appellant
I certify that:
Itl' II am admitted to practice in this Court and, if required by Interim Local Rule 46.1(a)(2), have renewed
myadmissionon _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OR
applied for admission on _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
Signature of Counsel: /s/ Mary E. Rasenberger
Type or Print Name:
Mary E. Rasenberger
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?