Connecticut Ironworkers Employ v. New England Regional Council
Filing
OPINION, vacating the judgment of the district court as to the Sherman Act claim, affirming the judgment as to the unfair labor practices claim and remanding the cause to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion, including for such additional discovery as will permit the District Court to be informed of the relevant history and permit the parties to move for summary judgment or, if necessary, to proceed to trial, by DJ, JAC, BDP, FILED.[2108081] [16-485]--[Edited 08/23/2017 by HT]
Case 16-485, Document 115-3, 08/23/2017, 2108081, Page1 of 1
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
ROBERT A. KATZMANN
CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE
CHIEF JUDGE
CLERK OF COURT
Date: August 23, 2017
Docket #: 16-485cv
Short Title: Connecticut Ironworkers Employ v. New
England Regional Council
DC Docket #: 10-cv-165
DC Court: CT (NEW HAVEN)
DC Judge: Underhill
VERIFIED ITEMIZED BILL OF COSTS
Counsel for
_________________________________________________________________________
respectfully submits, pursuant to FRAP 39 (c) the within bill of costs and requests the Clerk to
prepare an itemized statement of costs taxed against the
________________________________________________________________
and in favor of
_________________________________________________________________________
for insertion in the mandate.
Docketing Fee
_____________________
Costs of printing appendix (necessary copies ______________ ) _____________________
Costs of printing brief (necessary copies ______________ ____) _____________________
Costs of printing reply brief (necessary copies ______________ ) _____________________
(VERIFICATION HERE)
________________________
Signature
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?