Justin Layshock v. Hermitage Sch Dist

Filing 49

JUDGMENT, Affirmed. (Vacated as to No. 07-4465 only as rehearing has been granted in No. 07-4465) [07-4465, 07-4555]--[Edited 04/09/2010 by MLR] (TRG) [Entered: 02/04/2010 10:00 AM]

Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 07-4465 JUSTIN LAYSHOCK, a minor, by and through his parents; DONALD LAYSHOCK; CHERYL LAYSHOCK, individually and on behalf of their son v. HERMITAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT KAREN IONTA, District Superintendent; ERIC W. TROSCH, principal Hickory High School CHRIS GILL, Co-Principal Hickory High School, all in their official and individual capacity Hermitage School District, Appellant No. 07-4555 JUSTIN LAYSHOCK, a minor, by and through his parents; DONALD LAYSHOCK; CHERYL LAYSHOCK, individually and on behalf of their son v. HERMITAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT; KAREN IONTA, District Superintendent; ERIC W. TROSCH, principal Hickory High School; CHRIS GILL, Co-Principal Hickory High School, all in their official and individual capacity Donald Layshock; Cheryl Layshock, Appellants Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Civ. No. 06-cv-00116) District Judge: Hon. Terrence F. McVerry Before: McKEE, SMITH and ROTH, Circuit Judges JUDGMENT This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania and was argued by counsel on December 10, 2008. On consideration whereof, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this Court that the order of the said District Court entered November 14, 2007, granting summary judgment to Justin Layshock on his First Amendment claim and granting summary judgment to the Hermitage School District on Donald and Cheryl Layshock’s Fourteenth Amendment Due Process, is affirmed. All of the above in accordance with the opinion of this Court. ATTEST: /s/ Marcia M. Waldron Clerk Dated: February 4, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?