AT&T Inc v. FCC
NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Respondents FCC and USA requesting Addendum to brief including amended conclusion page with both signatures of counsel for Respondent's Brief. Compliance due 01/27/2009. (EAF)
AT&T Inc v. FCC
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
08-4024 AT&T Inc v. FCC FCC 08-207
The Court has received Respondent's Brief/Addendum from FCC and USA. The document does not comply with the following Court requirement(s) for electronic filing: The content of the brief is noncompliant as it lacks the following: signatures on brief of both Respondent's counsel in case. The party(ies) must file electronic and hard copies (original + 9 copies) of Addendum containing the missing content. Counsel or the party(ies) must correct the above listed deficiencies by 01/27/2009. No action will be taken on the document until these deficiencies are corrected. Pursuant to 3rd Cir. LAR Misc. 107.3 and 3rd Cir. LAR Misc. 113, if a party fails to comply with the electronic filing requirements, despite notice by the Clerk, the Court may, in its discretion, impose sanctions as it deems appropriate. Such sanctions include, but are not limited to, the dismissal of the appeal, imposition of costs or disciplinary sanctions upon a party or counsel. For the Court,
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk Dated: January 22, 2009 EAF/cc: Mary C. Albert, Esq. Colin S. Stretch, Esq. Robert J. Wiggers, Esq. Catherine G. O'Sullivan, Esq. Kelly P. Dunbar, Esq Michael A. Krasnow, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?