Ting Ying Tang v. Attorney General United State
Filing
NON COMPLIANCE Order issued to Petitioner Ting Ying Tang regarding the brief and appendix filed on 04/16/2013. Please open the attachment for the full text of the Order. Compliance due by 04/19/2013. This Order does not change the deadline for filing the next brief.
Case: 13-1419
Document: 003111229840
Page: 1
Date Filed: 04/16/2013
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
13-1419
Ting Ying Tang v. Attorney General United States
A089-905-761
ORDER
The Court has received the Brief with Volume I of Appendix attached from Petitioner Ting
Ying Tang.
The appendix does not comply with the following Court requirements:
Contents of Appendix- FRAP 30- The following is/are missing from the appendix
. Notice of Appeal or Petition for Review (Volume I only, LAR 32.2( c ))
Action Required Regarding Appendix
In order to cure errors with respect to CONTENT, Ting Ying Tang must file an addendum to
appendix containing the missing sections and or document(s) in electronic and paper format (4
paper copies with WHITE front and back covers).
This Order does not change the deadline for filing the next brief.
Counsel or the party(ies) must correct the above listed deficiencies by 04/19/2013. No action
will be taken on the document until the error(s) has (have) been corrected.
Pursuant to 3rd Cir. LAR Misc. 107.3 and 3rd Cir. LAR Misc. 113, if a party fails to
comply with the electronic filing requirements, despite notice by the Clerk, the Court may
impose sanctions. Such sanctions include, but are not limited to, imposition of costs,
disciplinary sanctions, and dismissal of the case.
For the Court,
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Date: 4/16/2013
EMA/cc:
Virginia M. Lum, Esq.
Richard Tarzia, Esq.
For questions please contact the Clerk's Office at 267-299-4941.
Case: 13-1419
Document: 003111229840
Page: 2
Date Filed: 04/16/2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?