David Mathias v. Superintendent Frackville SCI, et al

Filing

ORDER AMENDING OPINION (Coram: FISHER, KRAUSE and MELLOY, Circuit Judges) In order to address two points raised by Appellee/Cross-appellant after filing of the opinion in this matter, the Court has determined that the opinion filed on August 28, 2017 should be amended in minor respects. Those amendments appear on pp. 25-26 and 29 of the original opinion and do not alter the Court's disposition or judgment as previously entered. As such, the date for the entry of judgment will not be altered. The Clerk is directed to enter the amended opinion on the Court's docket, filed. Krause, Authoring Judge. [14-4694, 15-2694]

Download PDF
Case: 14-4694 Document: 003112783177 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/20/2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Nos. 14-4694 and 15-2694 DAVID MATHIAS, Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellants/Cross-Appellees (E.D. Pa. No. 14-4694) ORDER AMENDING OPINION PRESENT: FISHER, KRAUSE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges * In order to address two points raised by Appellee/Cross-appellant after the filing of the opinion in this matter, the Court has determined that the opinion filed on August 28, 2017 should be amended in minor respects. These amendments appear on pp. 25-26 and 29 of the original opinion and do not alter the Court's disposition or judgment as previously entered. As such, the date for entry of judgment will not be altered. The Clerk is directed to enter the amended opinion on the Court's docket. By the Court, s/ Cheryl Ann Krause Circuit Judge Date: November 20, 2017 * The Honorable D. Michael Fisher assumed senior status on February 1, 2017 and the Honorable Michael J. Melloy, Senior Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit sat by designation.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?