Laurence Kaplan v. Saint Peter's Healthcare Syste, et al


ORDER (MCKEE, AMBRO and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges), Reversing the judgment of the District Court dated March 31, 2014. Costs are taxed in favor of the Appellants, filed. Judge: THOMAS L. AMBRO, Authoring

Download PDF
Case: 15-1172 Document: 003112673707 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 15-1172 _____________ LAURENCE KAPLAN, on behalf of himself, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. SAINT PETER’S HEALTHCARE SYSTEM; RONALD C. RAK; SUSAN BALLESTERO, an individual; GARRICK STOLDT, an individual; JOHN and JANE DOES 1–20 Saint Peter’s Healthcare System, Ronald C. Rak, Susan Ballestero, Garrick Stoldt, Appellants ________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civil Action No. 3-13-cv-02941) District Judge: Honorable Michael A. Shipp ________________ On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States on July 7, 2017 Submitted on Remand July 7, 2017 Present: McKEE, AMBRO, and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges _____________________________ ORDER __________________________________ By opinion and judgment dated June 5, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States ordered the judgment of this Court entered December 29, 2015 be reversed. Advocate Health Care Network, et al. v. Stapleton, et al., __ U.S. __, 137 S.Ct. 1652 (2017). In accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court, the opinion and judgment of this Court are hereby vacated. It is further ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that the judgment Case: 15-1172 Document: 003112673707 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/13/2017 of the District Court dated March 31, 2014 is hereby reversed. Costs are taxed in favor of the Appellants. By the Court, s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge ATTEST: s/Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk Dated: July 13, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?