USA v. Kenneth Dougla
Filing
ORDER (Coram: SMITH, Chief Judge, MCKEE, AMBRO, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR. VANASKIE, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, and RESTREPO, Circuit Judges) A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc, it is ordered that the petition for rehearing is GRANTED. The Court en banc shall hear oral argument limited to the application of the enhancement for an abuse of position of trust under U.S.S.G. Section 3B1.3. The Clerk of this Court shall list the case for rehearing en banc on Wednesday October 18, 2017 at a time that is convenient to the Court. The opinion and judgment entered February 22, 2017, are hereby vacated, filed. Authoring Judge: Smith.--[Edited 06/02/2017 by TMM]--[Edited 06/02/2017 by TMM]
Case: 15-1754
Document: 003112640906
Page: 1
Date Filed: 06/02/2017
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 15-1754
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
KENNETH R. DOUGLAS,
Appellant
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Pennsylvania
(District Court No: 2-09-cr-00105-009)
ORDER SUR PETITION
FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Present: SMITH, Chief Judge, McKEE, AMBRO, CHAGARES, JORDAN,
HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, and
RESTREPO, Circuit Judges
A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above
captioned case, it is ordered that the petition for rehearing is GRANTED. The Court en
banc shall hear oral argument limited to the application of the enhancement for an abuse
of position of trust under U.S.S.G. ยง 3B1.3. The Clerk of this Court shall list the case for
rehearing en banc on Wednesday October 18, 2017 at a time that is convenient to the
Court. The opinion and judgment entered February 22, 2017, are hereby vacated.
Case: 15-1754
Document: 003112640906
Page: 2
BY THE COURT,
s/ D. Brooks Smith
Chief Judge
Dated: June 2, 2017
tmm/cc: Rebecca R. Haywood Esq.
Michael L. Ivory, Esq.
Arnold P. Bernard, Jr., Esq.
Date Filed: 06/02/2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?