Delaware Riverkeeper Network, et al v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
Filing
ORDER AMENDING OPINION (Coram: GREENAWAY, JR., SCIRICA and ROTH, Circuit Judges) ROTH, Authoring Judge. [15-2122, 15-2158]
Case: 15-2122
Document: 003112573190
Page: 1
Date Filed: 03/24/2017
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 15-2122
____________
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK;
MAYA VAN ROSSUM, the Delaware Riverkeeper,
Petitioners
v.
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION; PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION,
Respondents
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORP,
Intervenor Respondent
_________________________
No. 15-2158
_________________________
NEW JERSEY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION;
STONY BROOK MILLSTONE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION; FRIENDS OF
PRINCETON OPEN SPACE,
Petitioners
v.
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORP,
Respondents
Case: 15-2122
Document: 003112573190
Page: 2
Date Filed: 03/24/2017
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Agency Nos. FERC CP13-551-00; EA40-013 & EA45-002)
(Agency Nos. 0000-13-0012.1FHA140001,
0000-13-0012.1FWW140001, 0000-13-0012.2FHA140001
& 0000-13-0012.2FWW140001)
Argued on October 29, 2015
Before: GREENAWAY, JR., SCIRICA and ROTH, Circuit Judges
ORDER
By letter dated February 14, 2017, the Clerk solicited comments from the
Respondent and Intervenor Respondent with respect to the Court’s intention to replace
references to “tree clearing” contained in the opinion with the term “tree felling.” Upon
consideration of the parties’ responses, the Court has determined that an amended
opinion will be issued. The amendment does not alter the Court’s judgment previously
entered on August 8, 2016.
By the Court,
s/ Jane R. Roth
Circuit Judge
Dated: March 24, 2017
mlr/cc: all counsel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?