USA v. Binyamin Stimler

Filing

ORDER AMENDING OPINION (Clerk) The Clerk has been informed of a typographical error in the amended opinion which was filed on July, 17, 2017. Specifically, Justice Blackmun's name is misspelled in footnote 94 as Blackman on page 34 of the opinion. The opinion is hereby amended to correct the misspelling in footnote 94 to Blackmun, filed. [15-4053, 15-4094, 15-4095]

Download PDF
Case: 15-4053 Document: 003112677361 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/19/2017 PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 15-4053, 15-4094 & 15-4095 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BINYAMIN STIMLER, Appellant in No. 15-4053 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAY GOLDSTEIN a/k/a Yaakov JAY GOLDSTEIN, Appellant in No. 15-4094 UNITED STATES OF AMEREICA v. MENDEL EPSTEIN, Appellant in No. 15-4095 _______________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D. C. Nos. 3-14-cr-00287-005, 3-14-cr-00287-003 and 3-14-cr-00287-001) District Judge: Honorable Freda L. Wolfson ________________ Case: 15-4053 Document: 003112677361 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/19/2017 ORDER AMENDING OPINION The Clerk has been informed of a typographical error in the amended opinion which was filed on July, 17, 2017. Specifically, Justice Blackmun’s name is misspelled in footnote 94 on page 34 of the opinion. The opinion is hereby amended to correct the misspelling in footnote 94 as follows: The mere fact that the two other individuals were allowed to plead to violations of other statutes does not persuade us otherwise; prosecutors have broad discretion in deciding what to charge and what pleas to accept. See Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 368 n.2 (1978) (Blackmun, J., dissenting). For the Court, Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk Date: July 18, 2017 CJG/cc: George T. Vickers, Jr. Jerome A. Moschetta, Esq. David R. Fine, Esq. J. Nicholas Ranjan, Esq.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?