USA v. Binyamin Stimler
Filing
ORDER AMENDING OPINION (Clerk) The Clerk has been informed of a typographical error in the amended opinion which was filed on July, 17, 2017. Specifically, Justice Blackmun's name is misspelled in footnote 94 as Blackman on page 34 of the opinion. The opinion is hereby amended to correct the misspelling in footnote 94 to Blackmun, filed. [15-4053, 15-4094, 15-4095]
Case: 15-4053
Document: 003112677361
Page: 1
Date Filed: 07/19/2017
PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_____________
Nos. 15-4053, 15-4094 & 15-4095
_____________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
BINYAMIN STIMLER,
Appellant in No. 15-4053
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
JAY GOLDSTEIN a/k/a Yaakov
JAY GOLDSTEIN,
Appellant in No. 15-4094
UNITED STATES OF AMEREICA
v.
MENDEL EPSTEIN,
Appellant in No. 15-4095
_______________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey
(D. C. Nos. 3-14-cr-00287-005, 3-14-cr-00287-003
and 3-14-cr-00287-001)
District Judge: Honorable Freda L. Wolfson
________________
Case: 15-4053
Document: 003112677361
Page: 2
Date Filed: 07/19/2017
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
The Clerk has been informed of a typographical error in the amended opinion
which was filed on July, 17, 2017. Specifically, Justice Blackmun’s name is misspelled
in footnote 94 on page 34 of the opinion. The opinion is hereby amended to correct the
misspelling in footnote 94 as follows:
The mere fact that the two other individuals were allowed
to plead to violations of other statutes does not persuade us
otherwise; prosecutors have broad discretion in deciding what
to charge and what pleas to accept. See Bordenkircher v.
Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 368 n.2 (1978) (Blackmun, J.,
dissenting).
For the Court,
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Date: July 18, 2017
CJG/cc:
George T. Vickers, Jr.
Jerome A. Moschetta, Esq.
David R. Fine, Esq.
J. Nicholas Ranjan, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?