Richards Fields v. City of Philadelphia, et al

Filing

ORDER AMENDING OPINION (Clerk) The Court has been made aware of a typographical error in the opinion entered on July 7, 2017. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that sentence on page 19, paragraph 1, line 11 of the opinion should read: Notably, the plaintiff in Fordyce [v. City of Seattle, 55 F. 3d 436 (9th Cir. 1995)] claimed he was recording a public protest for a local news station."], filed. [16-1650, 16-1651]

Case: 16-1650

Document: 003112673005

Page: 1

Date Filed: 07/13/2017

PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
________________
No. 16-1650
________________
RICHARD FIELDS,
Appellant
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; SISCA,
POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 9547;
JOE DOE, AN UNKNOWN PHILADELPHIA
POLICE OFFICER
________________
No. 16-1651
________________
AMANDA GERACI,
Appellant
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; DAWN BROWN,
POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 2454;
TERRA M. BARROW, POLICE OFFICER,
BADGE NO. 1147; NIKKI L. JONES,
POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 2549;
RHONDA SMITH, POLICE OFFICER,
BADGE NO. 1373
________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Civil Action Nos. 2-14-cv-04424/05264)
District Judge: Honorable Mark A. Kearney
________________

Case: 16-1650

Document: 003112673005

Page: 2

Date Filed: 07/13/2017

Before: AMBRO, RESTREPO, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION
The Court has been made aware of a typographical error in the opinion entered on July 7,
2017. Accordingly, it is O R D E R E D that sentence on page 19, paragraph 1, line 11 of
the opinion should read:
Notably, the plaintiff in Fordyce [v. City of Seattle, 55 F.3d 436 (9th Cir.
1995)] claimed he was recording a public protest for a local news station.”); …

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Date: July 13, 2017