Theodore Hayes, et al v. Philip Harvey

Filing

ORDER filed (Coram: SMITH, Chief Judge, MCKEE, AMBRO, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY JR., VANASKIE, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, BIBAS and FISHER*, Circuit Judges) A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the captioned case, it is ordered that the petition for rehearing is GRANTED. The Clerk of this Court shall list the case for rehearing en banc at the convenience of the Court. The opinion and judgment entered October 18, 2017 are hereby vacated, filed. Authoring Judge: Smith. *Will participate as a member of the en banc court pursuant to 3d Cir. I.O.P.9.6.4.

Download PDF
Case: 16-2692 Document: 003112813924 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/29/2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 16-2692 _____________ THEODORE HAYES; AQEELA FOGLE, Appellants v. PHILIP E. HARVEY On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania District Court No. 2-15-cv-02617 District Judge: The Honorable Nitza I. Quinones Alejandro ORDER SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC Present: SMITH, Chief Judge, McKEE, AMBRO, CHAGARES, JORDAN HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, BIBAS, and FISHER ∗, Circuit Judges A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above captioned case, it is ordered that the petition for rehearing is GRANTED. The Clerk of this Court shall list the case for rehearing en banc at the convenience of the Court. The opinion and judgment entered October 18, 2017 are hereby vacated. BY THE COURT, s/ D. Brooks Smith Chief Judge Dated: December 29, 2017 ∗ Will participate as a member of the en banc court pursuant to 3d Cir. I.O.P. 9.6.4. Case: 16-2692 Document: 003112813924 tmm/cc: All Counsel of Record Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/29/2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?