Theodore Hayes, et al v. Philip Harvey
Filing
ORDER filed (Coram: SMITH, Chief Judge, MCKEE, AMBRO, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY JR., VANASKIE, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, BIBAS and FISHER*, Circuit Judges) A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the captioned case, it is ordered that the petition for rehearing is GRANTED. The Clerk of this Court shall list the case for rehearing en banc at the convenience of the Court. The opinion and judgment entered October 18, 2017 are hereby vacated, filed. Authoring Judge: Smith. *Will participate as a member of the en banc court pursuant to 3d Cir. I.O.P.9.6.4.
Case: 16-2692
Document: 003112813924
Page: 1
Date Filed: 12/29/2017
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 16-2692
_____________
THEODORE HAYES;
AQEELA FOGLE,
Appellants
v.
PHILIP E. HARVEY
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
District Court No. 2-15-cv-02617
District Judge: The Honorable Nitza I. Quinones Alejandro
ORDER SUR PETITION
FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Present: SMITH, Chief Judge, McKEE, AMBRO, CHAGARES, JORDAN
HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE,
RESTREPO, BIBAS, and FISHER ∗, Circuit Judges
A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above
captioned case, it is ordered that the petition for rehearing is GRANTED. The Clerk of
this Court shall list the case for rehearing en banc at the convenience of the Court. The
opinion and judgment entered October 18, 2017 are hereby vacated.
BY THE COURT,
s/ D. Brooks Smith
Chief Judge
Dated: December 29, 2017
∗
Will participate as a member of the en banc court pursuant to 3d Cir. I.O.P. 9.6.4.
Case: 16-2692
Document: 003112813924
tmm/cc: All Counsel of Record
Page: 2
Date Filed: 12/29/2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?