In re: Alton D. Brown, et al
Filing
NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: SMITH, Chief Judge, MCKEE and FUENTES, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 2. RESUBMIT HLD-003.
Case: 16-2749
Document: 003112564751
Page: 1
RESUBMIT HLD-003
Date Filed: 03/16/2017
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 16-2749
___________
IN RE: ALTON D. BROWN,
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
(Related to M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 3-14-cv-01180)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
February 13, 2017
Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, McKEE and FUENTES, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: March 16, 2017)
_________
OPINION*
_________
PER CURIAM
Alton D. Brown filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we direct the
District Court to rule on a request for an opportunity to appeal the District Court’s
dismissal order in Brown v. Lancaster, M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 3:14-cv-01180. The District
Court has since ruled on Brown’s filing. In light of the District Court’s action, the
question Brown presented is no longer a live controversy, so we will dismiss his
*
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not
constitute binding precedent.
Case: 16-2749
Document: 003112564751
Page: 2
Date Filed: 03/16/2017
mandamus petition as moot. See, e.g., Lusardi v. Xerox Corp., 975 F.2d 964, 974 (3d
Cir. 1992).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?