Michael Norwood v. USA
Filing
NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: MCKEE, JORDAN and RESTREPO, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 2. ALD-059
Case: 16-3865
Document: 003112508846
Page: 1
ALD-059
Date Filed: 01/11/2017
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 16-3865
___________
IN RE: MICHAEL NORWOOD,
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
(Related to D.N.J. Civ. No. 1-15-cv-02996)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
December 1, 2016
Before: MCKEE, JORDAN and RESTREPO, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: January 11, 2017)
_________
OPINION *
_________
PER CURIAM
Michael Norwood filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order
directing the District Court to rule on his amended motion under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255. The
District Court denied that motion on November 28, 2016. Thus, because Norwood has
*
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not
constitute binding precedent.
Case: 16-3865
Document: 003112508846
Page: 2
Date Filed: 01/11/2017
received all of the relief he requested, his petition is now moot. We will therefore
dismiss it. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?