In re: Shaun Rosiere

Filing

NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: SMITH, Chief Judge, MCKEE and FUENTES, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 2. HLD-006

Case: 17-1092

Document: 003112641108

Page: 1

HLD-006

Date Filed: 06/02/2017

NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 17-1092
___________
In re: SHAUN ROSIERE,
Petitioner
____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for District of New Jersey
(Related to D.N.J. Crim. Nos. 1-08-cr-00629-005; 1-09-cr-00720-001)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
March 2, 2017

Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, MCKEE and FUENTES, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: June 2, 2017)
_________
OPINION*
_________
PER CURIAM
Shaun Rosiere seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the District Court to rule on
three motions pending in the underlying criminal matter concerning the terms of his
supervised release. By order entered April 5, 2017, the District Court denied each
motion. In light of the District Court’s action, this mandamus petition no longer presents
a live controversy. Therefore, we will dismiss it as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny
*

This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not
constitute binding precedent.

Case: 17-1092

Document: 003112641108

Page: 2

Date Filed: 06/02/2017

Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the
course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiff’s personal stake in the outcome of a suit
or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be
dismissed as moot.”).

2