In re: Shaun Rosiere


NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: SMITH, Chief Judge, MCKEE and FUENTES, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 2. HLD-006

Download PDF
Case: 17-1092 Document: 003112641108 Page: 1 HLD-006 Date Filed: 06/02/2017 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 17-1092 ___________ In re: SHAUN ROSIERE, Petitioner ____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for District of New Jersey (Related to D.N.J. Crim. Nos. 1-08-cr-00629-005; 1-09-cr-00720-001) ____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. March 2, 2017 Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, MCKEE and FUENTES, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: June 2, 2017) _________ OPINION* _________ PER CURIAM Shaun Rosiere seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the District Court to rule on three motions pending in the underlying criminal matter concerning the terms of his supervised release. By order entered April 5, 2017, the District Court denied each motion. In light of the District Court’s action, this mandamus petition no longer presents a live controversy. Therefore, we will dismiss it as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny * This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. Case: 17-1092 Document: 003112641108 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/02/2017 Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiff’s personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?